Challenges/Coastal Carolina University/Accountant/Spot the Control Gap: Expense Reimbursement Walkthrough

Spot the Control Gap: Expense Reimbursement Walkthrough

You're a summer intern in Wells Fargo's Internal Audit group. Your team lead hands you a\ one-page write-up of how the expense reimbursement process currently works at a mid-size\ business unit and asks for a quick first-pass review…

Internal Audit
Risk & Controls
Data Analysis
Financial Services
Professional Skepticism
Estimated Time:
30 minutes
Difficulty:Intermediate
Status:Not started
Start this challenge

Create a free account to upload your work. Your progress saves as a draft until you submit.

What You'll Be Doing

You're a summer intern in Wells Fargo's Internal Audit group. Your team lead hands you a
one-page write-up of how the expense reimbursement process currently works at a mid-size
business unit and asks for a quick first-pass review before the team's kickoff meeting.

THE PROCESS (as described to you):

  1. Employee submits an expense report with receipts through an internal portal.
  2. Employee's direct manager reviews and clicks "Approve" — approval is required within 5 business days or the report auto-approves.
  3. Finance processes payment via the next payroll cycle. No secondary review before payment.
  4. Receipts over $75 require an itemized receipt; anything under does not.
  5. Quarterly, Finance spot-checks 10 reports out of several thousand for accuracy.

YOUR TASK:
In writing, identify 2–3 specific control gaps or risks in this process (be specific
about what could go wrong and how) and note one preliminary recommendation for each.
Then explain, in a short paragraph, how you'd use an AI tool (like Copilot) to help you
organize or research this — and where you'd stop trusting the AI's output and apply your
own judgment instead.

Then record a 2–3 minute video walking through how you found each issue and one specific
moment you'd double-check or push back on an AI-generated answer rather than accept it
as-is.

What You'll Accomplish

Communicate audit observations in a way a team lead could act on immediately

Identify control weaknesses in a described business process using structured analytical thinking

Translate an identified risk into a clear preliminary recommendation

Apply professional skepticism to AI-assisted research rather than accepting AI output uncritically

How Your Work Will Be Scored

Risk Identification — finds specific control gaps, not generic observations Recommendation Quality — each risk pairs with a concrete, actionable next step Audit Communication — findings read like a real preliminary audit observation Analytical Rigor — explains why something is a risk, not just that it "seems off" AI Fluency — shows professional skepticism toward AI output with a specific example

What to Submit

Control Gap Write-Up

Document · 2 pagesRequired

Format: .pdf, .doc, .docx, .rtf, .txt, .md

2–3 identified risks, each paired with a specific recommendation

Sign in to upload files

Video Walkthrough

Video · 5 minutesRequired

Format: .mp4, .mov, .webm

5 minute narrated explanation of findings and AI usage

Sign in to upload files